Care to provide data showing that Windows is less secure or that its security hasn't advanced? Are you suggesting that a hardware security cryptoprocessor doesn't make cryptography more secure?
Are you suggesting you can magically do that in software? Non-sequitur to the TPM topic, but again show your working. And while you're showing your working show us where MS said that telemetry was only for security. I mean you can go into the telemetry settings in windows and straight away see they flat out say. We already know the answer to that, since Microsoft implemented it in the next Windows version after the USDoJ had them over a barrel for anticompetitive practices and let them go with an apparent handslap.
Nobody sane ever had any doubt that a telemetry was for spying only and b MS would not be able to fix its persistently crappy security. And this is a nice example of why profit is literally highway robbery.
If you could, realistically, go around and take another road, you wouldn't be standing at the toll booth. I keep hearing this and after working pretty thoroughly with TPMs, I still have yet to see how this is the case. TPMs are not pre-loaded with well-known keys. So it's not like WideVine can just ask the TPM to decrypt without first staging it, which means at some point it passes through the OS anyway.
TPMs have very limited ability to ascertain the state of things when it is asked to do a decryption. You have PCRs that largely measure boot state but has no idea about nuanced application state. The nuanced a. Sure someone can in theory write a software module if they can get ahold of the standards, but you're not going to be able to get the signed certificates required to Attest the key, so it will never be a valid TPM -- you would have a sort of PM without the Trust part.
Uuum, no. Unless the video is literally encrypted with one's own EK, there's a step of code in-between that decrypts the video with its own given key, but is only allowed to run by the TPM if it itself is encrypted with the EK. Which does not stop anyone from running other software to just decrypt the video with that given key.
Or, even easier: Just grab it from the buffer right after decryption, and upload it for everyone else. Nope, that's not at all how it works.
The TPM has nothing to do with decoding the 'video'. The TPM contains an append-only 'log' area. This is cleared on boot. It also records whether secure boot is enabled.
UEFI then measures the kernel as it is loaded, and records that. The kernel then measures every piece of code it loads. Public key can be sent to the media or software provider, and part or all can be encrypted in a way that only your device can decrypt, as it is the only device with that private key. In use, the keys on a TPM are used to sign and encrypt other more useful keys that are stored on disk, in ways to reduce the need to continuously bang away at the TPM, but in essence that's how it c.
At some point the PCRs stop getting extended. PCRs are incapable of modeling a system as open ended as a desktop OS state. So many executables running that any attempt to seal to PCRs would be fruitless, as the ordering and quantity, or even running the same trusted application twice in such a scenario would extend the pcr away from the sealed state.
Trying to use PCRs to do such a thing would be impossibly fragile. It can help the OS know that the underlying platform hasn't been tampered with since last. How does your comment even relate to my argument?
According to your explanation, you could just use a different player to play back the encrypted "media" [plural of "medium"].
Where would the key come from, if it isn't secured by the EK? Snake oil all th. You can have an endorsement key, though you may not be able to get a cert from AMD, Intel, Infineon, et all. It sounds like Windows might not require any particular manufacturer signature on the EK to meet its requirements. It doesn't help that MS hasn't been crystal clear about precisely how they view TPM2 as absolutely mandatory now. However there are a wide variety of reasons why they may need a TPM2, but not need a well-known authority trusting it.
For example, if they decide BitLocker on all the time but didn't want to require passwords for every boot, then TPM2 would be a pretty logical requirement for how to seal the bitlocker key for normal boot process. Of course.
But somebody would need to get a respective key. It is quite possible that Win11 will piss of enough people that somebody will reverse engineer a TPM. It is not that hard, hardware at this price-point cannot really be secure against a competent attack.
It is, I had to conduct a security audit of a TPM in a former life. Also, you would have heard of attacks. Don't think no one has been trying. Ah, so you are one of those that will call something "tamper proof"? You know there is a reason any competent security person will only use the term "tamper resistant" and it is a good reason. Because no hardware ever has withstood a competent and determined attack so far and no hardware claimed to be "secure" ever was.
For TPMs, there was just no good reason for a competent and determined attack so far or if somebody has done it, they kept it secret. Or just generate a randomly new EK. So yes, it's possible and yes it's been done. Technically your soft tpm won't be signed by Intel or AMD or Infineon, etc, but it appears that Windows doesn't in and of itself care.
I mean that is actually the entire point of the article, they are enforcing it and no one is happy. How did you read it differently? Win11 is not released at this time. And they may well reduce or remove requirements even after release.
Have you missed those little details somehow? Also, why would I take my information from a single article? Am I reading this right, as in "you are not allowed to run Windows in a VM anymore"? And yes, I even paid for a license. But if they remove this possibility, hell no I'm not putting Windows back as my main OS. So what is their point here? They are not going to remove that possibility. There are too many use-cases for fully virtualized Windows i.
They may require the "pro" version, but that is basically it. First microsoft fucks over all the users six ways from sunday, then they throw some breadcrumbs at "professionals" that are pretty much unusable to everyone else. And this gets hailed as "extremely useful" in the fawning press. It's no coincidence that these editors tend to copy rather than summarise, nor is it a coincidence that these editors tend to focus on this sort of reality distortion.
They really don't know any better. That's both the slashdot editors and their favourite "news" sources, of course. I would've thought they'd only cave in much later when it becomes obvious that not even people who can upgrade according to their ridiculous members-only-club rules don't want that POS.
However, Microsoft is now requiring compatible hardware even on virtual machines and taking a firm stance on its system requirement, going as far as to say that people who install Windows 11 on incompatible hardware may not get security updates.
And if not, well, it's just Win Not something anyone would want, not even for free. Sweeten the deal, MS. Pay me. So, if you want to uninstall an Infineon TPM Professional package, the first solution is to uninstall it using programs and features.
Press Start, type Uninstall program in the Search for programs and files , and then click on the result. Find the Infineon TPM Professional software package in the list, click on it and then click the Remove button to start uninstalling.
Most computer programs have an executable file called uninst You will find these files in the installation folder of the Infineon TPM Professional software package. System Restore is a utility provided with the Windows operating system that helps computer users restore the system to its previous state and remove programs that interfere with the operation of the computer. If you created a System Restore Point before installing the program, you can use System Restore to restore the system and completely destroy unwanted programs such as the Infineon TPM Professional software package.
Before you perform a system restore, you need to back up your personal files and data. Click on the System Protection button on the left side of the system window. The System Properties window is displayed.
Select a date and time from the list and press Next. For instructions, see your server system documentation. Copy it to the target notebook as. On the HP download page, To support this, both the configuration and the TPM files need to be updated.
Please do the following:. Posted: 3 days ago TPM update from 1. Rentals Details: PM. Also, include your BIN file with password should you need one. You do not need to create a Program, we need this container purely to hold the content.
Below is an example of what your End of Development Support. This product is no longer being actively supported by development End of Development Support and no further software updates will be provided.
Posted: 4 days ago TPM is a dedicated microcontroller designed to secure hardware by integrating cryptographic keys into devices and is used for secured crypto processes within computing devices as well as for secured storage of critical data.
TPM s are typically used in business laptops, routers and embedded and IoT devices. Windows 10, some Windows 8, TPM 2. Please check the link below to better identify your product.
TPMs also show up in the Device Manager, so it may be worth ensuring. In this package, you will get a USB 3. When USB standards change from an existing version to a newer version, as they did from 1. I know my CPU can support faster than 2. Some files at could be packed with winzip or winrar software. Average rating, 3. Uploaded on, downloaded times, receiving a. You can read the opinion of each user and how they rate the phone in 11 categories.
To determine which Windows Mobile operating system you re using if your phone doesn t have a touch screen, click Start, click Settings, and then click About.
0コメント